Back to home page

Re:BUILDING

A Preservation Newsletter

Volume 17 - October 28, 2003

Published by Martin Hackl, Oak Park, Illinois

Hi All,

This issue of the Re:BUILDING Newsletter has only one story to tell.  And that story is a celebration!  One story of success like this makes a hundred other losses more bearable for me.  A new friend and kindred spirit, Miriam Kelm tells part of the story in her own words, below, which she titled: "That Little Van Bergen on St. Johns". 

As I like to think of it, Miriam has re-created a little piece of Eden for herself.  When I met Miriam, she had just purchased the small, and much altered, late Prairie School home designed by architect, John Van Bergen.  The house at 1251 St. Johns, in Highland Park, Illinois, was built poised right over a small, beautiful ravine with a creek running through it.

The building retained very little of the look that it had originally, and it took a creative eye to even recognize that there was some really wonderful architecture there, that might be worth saving.  Fortunately, the original building and its additions were so well built structurally, that it was very well possible to save this building.  Miriam has given this little Van Bergen designed home a second life, which gives me great joy and inspires me even more to keep up the fight trying to help save so many of these small gems from demolition.

I hope Miriam's story inspires you as well!

Yours Truly,

Marty

That Little Van Bergen on St. Johns

by Miriam Kelm

I was familiar with "buyer’s remorse", but had never felt it to the degree that it hit after I purchased my house.  After purchasing the house and looking for contractors to do the renovation, two contractors advised me to sell it as a tear down.  They did not want to take on the remodeling of a house John Van Bergen had built in 1924 for a woman art teacher.  Had I made a huge mistake? 

In 1970, a significant remodeling had "colonialized" the interior.  Crown moldings, traditional cabinetry, wainscoting, the whole bit.  Was it unwise to try to return the place to it’s prairie-style roots?

I saw the rundown condition of the place as rationale for a total refurbishing.  You don’t have to wonder if window replacement would just be a luxury when those windows won’t close and duct tape is what keeps out the winter wind.  New bathrooms make sense when the plaster is crumbling and fixtures are over the hill.  The basement was a grim pit and, just to add to the ambience, full of mouse droppings. 

What were the good points?  The price was low enough to justify some investment, the house was close to my daughter and her family, I fell in love with the setting on the side of a small ravine with woods and a little creek, and the "flow" of the rooms just felt right to me. 

One influence was information Marty Hackl had recently provided to the seller.  He had written a note informing that the house was a Van Bergen and had included some biographical information about the architect.  That immediately guided me in the direction a refurbishing could take: Toward the prairie style, which I love, and toward the Frank Lloyd Wright influence, which I also love (as long as the roof doesn’t leak).

So, I gave in to a long held feeling that there would be one more little house for me before a condo or the "rest home."  I had a consultation with Marty about some of the ideas I had and he was able to identify for me some of the Van Bergen touches.  His information is what saved the chimney from a tuck-pointing that would have ruined the distinctive Van Bergen look.  When I was at rock bottom on whether or not to try to save the place, Marty gave encouragement and gave me names of people in the Highland Park building department to talk to about the house. 

I found a contractor willing to take it on,  Scott Pearson (Advance Contracting, Inc.) and to even be optimistic about the possibilities.  Were the original cost estimates accurate?  Well, you know the answer to that!  Addendums to the contract numbered four.  Or was it five?  Just too many possibilities.

Had I not found Scott, the project would have been even more challenging.  The house I was living in had sold and there was a deadline for completion of the remodeling.  Actually, the buyers gave a very generous closing date.  They had looked at the house on St. Johns, so they knew how much work was ahead.  During the delay of waiting (forever, it seemed) for the building permit, as much of the demolition work as possible was done, along with a number of things that were classified as repairs, and for which no permits were required.

As work proceeded, I heard friends involved in their own remodeling complain of never being able to get in touch with their contractors.  I told them I couldn't get away from mine.  Phone calls at least once a day, usually more.  My instructions were to call him anytime from 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m., seven days a week, with any question or idea.  Questions were always answered within the day they were asked, and he was open to my ideas.  The carpenters were great, even replicating the profile of the old siding to build the little sidewall on the steps to the front door and following my drawing and measurements of how I wanted the window seat to be built.

Even so, at the end, it all got a little tight.  One day when I came to the house, there were no fewer that ten vehicles parked there.  Inside, workers were all over the place.  At the very end, some uncompleted work meant that we could not pass the final inspection on the day before I was to move in.  We had to have a special visit from inspectors while my furniture was being loaded onto the van.  More than a little stress there.  But, a job that probably would have taken, on average, six to eight months of construction, was done, from planning to completion, in four. 

Throughout the process, many of the usual "old house" issues came up. 
There were several times in the process when conflicts between opportunity to restore vs. replace emerged.  When decisions had to made on whether to repair or replace, more often than not, it was replace.  Removal of the vinyl tile in one bathroom revealed the original hexagonal ceramic tiles.  Some were broken, but replacements could have been found.  Instead, I stayed with my plan to use slate on that floor.  The hardwood floors, with all their patches and gaps, looked good enough to me, but the contractor convinced me that it would be about the same cost to have all new floors instead of getting into the labor intensive job of filling gaps, trying to line up the boards in rooms where I was adding wood, and having to "picture frame" the registers for the new furnace ducts. 

The toughest decision was when removal of plaster around the fireplace revealed the outline of the original Van Bergen. 

This is similar to what the original fireplace looked like (from the Ella Van Bergen House in Highland Park - right down the street).

 All was on hold and I suffered three days of angst over whether or not to tear out the "new."  The contractor, referring to the existing surround and hearth, said, "You’ve got at least $2500 worth of slate here, Why take it out?"  The masons convinced me that there was a high risk of everything coming down if they tried to take out the iron supporting the newer surround and firebox.  Marty was able to tell me that one characteristic of that fireplace would have been a poor "draw" because of the size of the stone firebox.  Also, by that time, I had become excited about the idea that brick on three sides would mean a beautiful brick wall in the little den/office.

That fireplace, a window seat I had built in a bay window, the removal of the wall between the dining room and kitchen, the nine-light windows, and the absolute transformation of the basement are my favorite changes.  The flat panel doors throughout, mission style cherry kitchen cabinets, a pottery sink in the little bathroom, and a stunning Arts and Crafts style front door are other favorites. 

All in all, I now have a little jewel of a house that feels like home to me.  The visits of friends and frequent presence of family have sanctified the space.  My two cats love the views from the windows, my granddaughter loves the creek and her lower level playroom. Definitely worth the stress and struggle.  Not sure about the money, only time will answer that one.  I am glad that my buyer’s remorse did not result in turning my back on the house. 

During the process, the encouraging words of a friend who had seen the house before anything had been done to it kept coming back to me.  She told me "Miriam, it will be just perfect for you."  She was right.


     Miriam's cat "Mikie"

   Miriam (left) and my wife, Avey enjoying the sunny "new" living room.

Below are some before and after photos of the interior of the house.  WOW, it's hard to believe!

(click on thumbnail photos to enlarge)

 
       
       
     

Below are some exterior photos from when Avey and I visited Miriam at her home earlier this month.  Landscaping will be done next Spring.

   
 
   
       
Below are photos during construction
     

For some previous background on this house, go here: http://www.re-building.com/nl15/nl15fricke.htm

Also, a recent connection that I have made, is that the original owner of this house, Delia Fricke, shares her name with the owner of the William and Delia Fricke house in Oak Park, designed by Frank Lloyd Wright in 1901, on Fair Oaks.  This is the Wright designed home which is right next to the Van Bergen home at 532 Fair Oaks.  So, John Van Bergen would have known the Oak Park Frickes.

Is this the same Delia Fricke?  A daughter?  A relative?  For now, I think I'll leave this question for a later date - or for other scholars or researchers to figure out.

 

Subscriptions to this Newsletter are free.  Subscribers are notified of the latest issues by e-mail.  If you wish to be added to the Subscriber mailing, or wish to have your name removed from the list, please e-mail your request to:

 M_Hackl@ameritech.net

 

Copyright © 2003 Martin Hackl